Attorneys & Lawyers & Counselors, Fraudulently Fooled

Was law firm duped? ‘Lawyer’ practiced there a decade and won partnership; was she licensed?

Won’t Be Fooled Againhammer-1-1282167-m

Not too long ago, an almost exact situation occurred here in Minneapolis at a large law firm except I think the con was a fake litigator. There were big concerns about any attempts to challenge the cases she worked on as be invalid or subject to motions to reopen, challenge settlement agreements and vacate judgments by opposing counsel wanting to relitigate the cases. Seems almost unbelievable that you’d be able to get away with this at all, let alone for any length of time . . . Full story here: Was law firm duped? ‘Lawyer’ practiced there a decade and won partnership; was she licensed?.

MKT

Standard
Fraudulently Fooled

Not So Fancy . . . It’s a Forgery?

Oh no, Iggy is suing an ex-boyfriend for copyright infringement and other intellectual property claims! The lawsuit alleges that in 2008 the ex (he was 33 and she was 17 at the time) downloaded some songs Iggy had stored on her laptop. Iggy had recorded the raps long before becoming so well known and overplayed (don’t get me wrong, she’s awesome). The ex says he has a signed contract giving him the rights to use (and profit from) the early material.

But the Complaint alleges the contract is bogus:

The Forged Agreement contains tell-tale signs that it is not genuine.
For example, it includes mismatched fonts on the signature page; the signature page
contains no substantive text; the paragraph numbers are out of sequence; the signature line is for “Wine Enterprises, inc.” [sic] rather than, as is customary, for an authorized agent; and it provides, as an address for legal notices, the contact information of an attorney who had no knowledge of the Forged Agreement until Azalea’s representatives recently brought it to his attention.

I love the part where they list an attorney’s name on the document, someone contacts the attorney and he doesn’t know what the hell they’re talking about. Can he charge a fee to the ex for listing him as the attorney on the agreement? I hope so.

Anyway, the story gets more interesting but you have to read between the lines and make things up, I guess. Here’s the Complaint and a much more complete and compelling version of the story.

BTW: No pictures because I don’t want Izzy to sue me too!

Standard
Fraudulently Fooled

Another Scam Posing as Court Seeking Personal ID from “Jurors”

From the United States Courts, a new personal information scam posing as seeking information related to serving as a juror in federal court:

 Juror Scam

THIRD BRANCH NEWS

  1. gov | court locator | news

 

Public Alert: New Juror Scam Seeks Personal Data

A new juror scam email, which fraudulently seeks personal information that could aid identity theft,has been reported in at least 14 federal court districts.According to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, citizens received emails claimingtheyhad been selected for jury service and demanding that they return a form with such information as Social Security and driver’s license numbers, date of birth, cell phone number, and mother’s maiden name.According to the email, anyone who failed toprovide the information would be ordered to court to explain their failure, and could face fines and jail time. The email also falsely claimed that itwas affiliated witheJuror, an online registration program used in about 80 U.S. court districts.Read the full story
Standard
Fraudulently Fooled

Latest in Deceptive Marketing

For direct marketing, it must be a significant hurdle to clear to just get your mailing opened rather than instantly recycled. Twice in two months I have received the same mailing.

With all of the recalls GM has issued lately and the horrible news about the ignition switch defect that was apparently only a few bucks to fix yet it was not disclosed and people died due to the defect. You might have to own a General Motors vehicle for it to have the greatest impact.

envelope2

As you see, the mailing looks pretty important with the tear-off strips to open the sides, the text only design (without color), the important looking serif font in ALL CAPS and the heavy use of bolded text. It almost looks governmental! Notice the warning under the REQUEST FOR ACTION line about the criminal penalties for interfering with the mail! Even a partial and incomplete cite to a federal statute is included. But don’t miss the subtle, fine print stating it is to be opened by the addressee “OR CURRENT VEHICLE OWNER ONLY.” The key to creditability is always in the discrete details.

The deception worked on me (or maybe it was curiosity) and I opened it up. Upon my first look inside it still appeared very official. But low and behold, I once I looked closer I could see it wasn’t anything special.

envelope3

I was quite disappointed to see it was just for an extended car warranty. It even says right on it  that it requires repairs to be pre-authorized (although it is in tiny print).

Now don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying it isn’t a scam. After all, have you ever had an extended auto warranty and tried to make a claim. A claim that wasn’t pre-approved?

Standard
Fraudulently Fooled, It's Criminal!

Warning! Arrest Warrant Scam | United States Courts

image

You’ve received a warrant by fax or email saying a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government wants to arrest you. Charges may be for money laundering or bank fraud, or missed jury duty. To avoid arrest, the warrant says, send money.

Read more here . . .

Warning! Arrest Warrant Scam | United States Courts.

Standard
Appealing Appeals Applied, Attorneys & Lawyers & Counselors, Constitutionally Civil Rights, Contractually Bound, Discovered on Demand, Fraudulently Fooled, Legally Educated, Litigation of Business | Business of Litigation, Technically Lawful, Uncategorized

New Name–New Logo–Same Firm

MKT Law-LOGO

Practical Counsel | Aggressive Protection | Creative Solutions

A Blog about Litigation and Business

Standard
Appealing Appeals Applied, Fraudulently Fooled, Legally Educated

Pretrial e-mail Scam Reports from Minnesota Court of Appeals

WARNING, SCAMMER ALERT!

The Minnesota courts website, www.mncourts.gov, reports fraudulent emails appearing to be from the a Court of Appeals has been making the rounds to in-boxes recently.  The official notice is below.

Five More Tips It’s a Fraud

1. No “complaint” originally filed with Court of Appeals

2. E-mail address not governmental

3. No “trial” in Court of Appeals

4. Poor grammar

5. No electronic communications YET from Minnesota Appellate Courts.

They play off fear and ignorance to have you bite on these e-mail scams so that you will open the attachments.  Don’t do it unless you have confirmed the e-mail from other sources first. Be diligent people!!! The fraud will never end but can be beaten with caution, knowledge and education!

MKT

Notice: Pretrial e-mail Scam Reported

The Minnesota Judicial Branch has learned of an e-mail scam where recipients are receiving a pretrial notice regarding a court complaint.  The public should be aware that the e-mails are not coming from the Minnesota Judicial Branch or the Minnesota appellate courts, and they should not open the e-mail or respond.  Official court communications will only be sent by phone or U.S. mail.  An example of the message is included below:

FROM: Minnesota Court of Appeals

Mon 2/3/2014 8:46 PM Pretrial notice Hereby we confirm that your complaint has been received together with enclosures dated January 30, 2014. The complaint will be reviewed in court in the nearest possible time based on the documents and information you have previously provided. You do not have to be present at trial in person if the Court does not suggest otherwise. Please use this link to check your complaint once again and confirm it. If we do not get your confirmation the claim will be cancelled. You will be further notified without delay of any judgement delivered in regard to your complaint. Sincerely, Court secretary

20140213-084000.jpg

20140213-084024.jpg

Standard
Attorneys & Lawyers & Counselors, Fraudulently Fooled

Beware of email attachments purporting to carry case information, courts warn

If I skip my hearing on Tuesday and claim it was because I thought my Notice was a fake court e-mail, will that be a good enough excuse?

“But Your Honor, after Target got hacked and my bank account was drained, I just just couldn’t take any chances.”

MKT
Do I really need to type CLICK BELOW FOR THE REST OF THE STORY?

Beware of email attachments purporting to carry case information, courts warn.

20140118-200938.jpg

Standard
Attorneys & Lawyers & Counselors, Fraudulently Fooled, Litigation of Business | Business of Litigation

U.S. Judge Cuts Attorney Fees in Chinese Companies’ Price-Fixing Case

moneymoney

OK, it’s a price-fixing case and the attorney’s fees were lowered by the Court (a joke’s in there screaming to be let out). I know not many will see an injustice here. I know not many will defend class action lawyer fee awards. But think this one through with me. I’ll lead . . .

  • Money, it’s a Gas

The firms put in a total of $14,000,000.00 worth of their attorneys’ time. They could have done other work and been paid a guaranteed fee with no real risk. But they took this case and put their time on the line. They could have lost and been paid $0.00 per hour. Could have spent a lot of time they would never get back. No guarantee of success. A real chance of loss.

The firms also pulled out their own wallets and fronted about $4,000,000.00 in costs. This is different from time spent on a case. They had already spent time to earn the $4M first. They took a chance and doubled down with their time. No guarantee of success. A real chance of loss.

  • Now Gimme Money, That’s What I Want

If you take a high risk, you deserve a high reward. If the reward is low, no one will take the big risks. These firms deserve a high reward for taking this high risk–with their own money at stake. Why? Even if they personally profit off their own skills, talents and commitment, the profit they gained was realized by all US consumers. You have to consider the result. They procured a significant public good the entire country will enjoy. That’s not hyperbolic. That’s a fact.

  • Anything, Anything–Anything For Money

Don’t get distracted by all the zeros. Or the kind praise the Judge lavished on the lawyers for a job well done. An awesome job done. A job producing tangible public benefits. The firms held a foreign company responsible for price gouging US consumers. Violating US law for a profit. The attorneys recouped ill-gotten gains for price-gouged US consumers. The private law firms have provided a reason to deter future scams for the public. The lawyers got retribution for harmed US consumers, while protecting US consumers from the potential of recurring conduct. The list can go on.

  • Money Makes The World Go Around

To me, this sounds like a governmental responsibility. But no. The government ain’t got no time for that! Instead, the government made a law that would limit the compensation to the attorneys. In effect, deterring attorneys from enforcing US laws against unlawful practices by foreign businesses. This seems backwards to me.

The lawyers did a good job. The Judge said nice things. Then the law was applied and took 2/3 of the pay away. Kinda like expecting  $15.00 an hour if you do a real good job. No guarantee. But a chance. You do a real good job anyway. And ask.  For your reward, you are paid $5 an hour instead. You won. But the risk was not worth the reward.

Next time what do you do? Take a chance anyway? Only the fools. But don’t worry. The government is here to serve and protect foreign corporations US consumers!  

The real article follows . . .

U.S. judge shaves fee request in vitamin C price-fixing case

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A U.S. federal judge on Monday praised the plaintiffs’ attorneys who obtained a $153.3 million judgment against two Chinese companies in a price-fixing case over vitamin C, but still found reason to shave over $9 million off their fee request.

In a written decision, U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan of Brooklyn rejected a request for $13.7 million in attorneys fees by three law firms, citing roughly $9.5 million in fees they were awarded as  . . . . READ MORE:  U.S. judge shaves fee request in vitamin C price-fixing case.
Standard
Fraudulently Fooled, Litigation of Business | Business of Litigation

Best Password Idea Ever!

"Enter Password"

I use a couple of different apps to secure, assign and remember my passwords and I couldn’t live without them. But this is clever. It does not fix the risk of using the same password for more than one website, but it is clearly the winner of 2013’s “Damn, why didn’t I think of that?” award.

Click the following link to reveal this excellent idea in an article from Business Insider:

Idea For Easy-To-Remember Passwords – Business Insider

 

 

Standard