Attorneys & Lawyers & Counselors, Discovered on Demand, Litigation of Business | Business of Litigation, Publicly Recorded, Technically Lawful

Blog Cheating a/k/a The INTRODUCTION TO LOCATING ASSETS

I’m going to post some stuff I already have written. It is interesting and topical for this blog; maybe even educational. But it will be recycled (at least for me–that’s the cheating part). The first version was written circa 2003, updated every year or two, with the last revision in 2010.

I know this is highly unusual, but tonight I will post the part called INTRODUCTION and then the next section BUSINESS FILING RECORDS. If I don’t lose all my readers, we can progress from there. I’ll watch the analytics.  Without further ado, here comes the title (the INTRODUCTION is right after that part):

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Post Judgment Creditors’ Rights

Uncovering Assets

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

PUBLIC RECORDS

Information is the oxygen of the modern age.

Ronald Reagan (b. 1911), former U.S. President. (London, June 14, 1989).

A.            INTRODUCTION 

Locating, retrieving and analyzing debtors’ assets is one of the most important aspects of successfully collecting a debt. Finding debtors’ assets can be difficult, time-consuming, expensive and not always fruitful.  But finding debtors’ assets is the first step in successfully collecting a debt.  Since many debtors hide assets or deny the existence of assets, it is generally a wise practice to dig up some information from public records prior to contacting a debtor.  Accordingly, this guide is designed to provide a method that may be utilized to provide a creditor or a creditors’ agent/representative an effective and economical way to find debtors’ assets.

Just like anything else, locating debtors’ assets can be done in a variety of ways, including physically going to governmental record depositories and researching and copying any asset information uncovered.  Some agencies even provide a great deal of information with just a phone call.

Computer assisted public record access and research has greatly expanded in recent years. It may be done via private and governmental pay subscription, computer-based systems. A couple of private service providers are Westlaw (www.westlaw.com) and Lexis-Nexis (www.lexis.com). Both of these providers are expensive, but for any firm collecting numerous debts it is an invaluable resource. 

Governmental Internet websites are rapidly expanding what information they provide. Many of these websites still provide information for free, but it appears there is a definite trend to charge (usually minimally) for access to the information via the Internet.  

The following is not an exhaustive discussion on access and research into Minnesota’s public records. It does discuss a few valuable resources for locating debtors’ assets and how to obtain that information via computer, telephone, mail or the good old “going down to the courthouse.” It is written as a primer for finding public record information.   

 

More to come.

MKT

Standard
Appealing Appeals Applied, Attorneys & Lawyers & Counselors, Constitutionally Civil Rights, Contractually Bound, Discovered on Demand, Fraudulently Fooled, Legally Educated, Litigation of Business | Business of Litigation, Technically Lawful, Uncategorized

New Name–New Logo–Same Firm

MKT Law-LOGO

Practical Counsel | Aggressive Protection | Creative Solutions

A Blog about Litigation and Business

Standard
Appealing Appeals Applied, Fraudulently Fooled, Legally Educated

Pretrial e-mail Scam Reports from Minnesota Court of Appeals

WARNING, SCAMMER ALERT!

The Minnesota courts website, www.mncourts.gov, reports fraudulent emails appearing to be from the a Court of Appeals has been making the rounds to in-boxes recently.  The official notice is below.

Five More Tips It’s a Fraud

1. No “complaint” originally filed with Court of Appeals

2. E-mail address not governmental

3. No “trial” in Court of Appeals

4. Poor grammar

5. No electronic communications YET from Minnesota Appellate Courts.

They play off fear and ignorance to have you bite on these e-mail scams so that you will open the attachments.  Don’t do it unless you have confirmed the e-mail from other sources first. Be diligent people!!! The fraud will never end but can be beaten with caution, knowledge and education!

MKT

Notice: Pretrial e-mail Scam Reported

The Minnesota Judicial Branch has learned of an e-mail scam where recipients are receiving a pretrial notice regarding a court complaint.  The public should be aware that the e-mails are not coming from the Minnesota Judicial Branch or the Minnesota appellate courts, and they should not open the e-mail or respond.  Official court communications will only be sent by phone or U.S. mail.  An example of the message is included below:

FROM: Minnesota Court of Appeals

Mon 2/3/2014 8:46 PM Pretrial notice Hereby we confirm that your complaint has been received together with enclosures dated January 30, 2014. The complaint will be reviewed in court in the nearest possible time based on the documents and information you have previously provided. You do not have to be present at trial in person if the Court does not suggest otherwise. Please use this link to check your complaint once again and confirm it. If we do not get your confirmation the claim will be cancelled. You will be further notified without delay of any judgement delivered in regard to your complaint. Sincerely, Court secretary

20140213-084000.jpg

20140213-084024.jpg

Standard
Attorneys & Lawyers & Counselors, Legally Educated, Litigation of Business | Business of Litigation

Coming soon to a CLE in Bloomington, MN . . .

This coming Friday February 14, 2014 it’s the Judgment Enforcement CLE!!! Come one, Come all!

MKT Law's avatarA Litigator's Blog | MKT Law, PLC

Judgment Enforcement in Minnesota

Bloomington, MN — February 14, 2014

 

Holiday Inn Bloomington I-35, 1201 West 94th Street in Bloomington, MN

Live Seminar 

  • February 14, 2014
  • Bloomington, MN
  • 9:00 am – 4:30 pm

Look below!!! I’m doing it again . . . 

It’s me speaking at a CLE! Click: MKT!

I’m speaking at this Lorman CLE at 9 am. Right in between somebody named Registration and right before Break goes on!

Come on out on Valentines Day and learn about Judgment Enforcement in Minnesota. I’ll speak about ethics issues and cases unique to the collection attorney. I’m even updating my written materials from last year. I might have handouts. Handouts for all!

If you click on my initials above or EVEN RIGHT HERE, you can get 50% off the registration fee! A very lovely discount as a valentine from me (actually I just posted the link). So don’t…

View original post 219 more words

Standard
Constitutionally Civil Rights

Know Your Rights: Photographers

Great article here. This is all well settled law but selectively obeyed if convenient by “The Man.” During the 2008 Republican National Convention in Saint Paul I got harassed but no gear or cards taken. Others weren’t so lucky! –MKT

mdhawthorne's avatarMusings from a Middle Aged Man

CamFlagTaking photographs of things that are plainly visible from public spaces is a constitutional right – and that includes federal buildings, transportation facilities, and police and other government officials carrying out their duties. Unfortunately, there is a widespread, continuing pattern of law enforcement officers ordering people to stop taking photographs from public places, and harassing, detaining and arresting those who fail to comply.


Your rights as a photographer:

  • When in public spaces where you are lawfully present you have the right to photograph anything that is in plain view. That includes pictures of federal buildings, transportation facilities, and police. Such photography is a form of publicoversight over the government and is important in a free society.
  • When you are on private property, the property owner may set rules about the taking of photographs. If you disobey the property owner’s rules, they can order you off their property (and have…

View original post 710 more words

Standard
Litigation of Business | Business of Litigation, Technically Lawful

I approve this message–Firm Central

Firm Central Testimonial Video

MKT Law Office, LLC Video Testimonial (1:29).

Hi, it’s me. I’m in a West video for Firm Central!!!!!

MKT

Standard
Appealing Appeals Applied, Attorneys & Lawyers & Counselors, Legally Educated

Civil Rights CLE and Upcoming Moot Court Competition

20140131-233141.jpg

Civil Rights CLE

Today I had the pleasure of serving as one of the presenters at a CLE (continuing legal education) at the U of M Law School. It was on the same case we are teaching in our Civil Rights Moot Court class this year: Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Secretary of U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, 724 F.3d 377 (3d Cir. 2013). It had the coolest title of any CLE I ever spoke at before: Corporations: How Human Are They? Do They Have A Right To The Free Exercise of Religion?

It’s an ObamaCare case, with a closely-held, private corporation and its shareholders (all part of a seriously religious family) wanting to be exempted from providing contraceptive-coverage for the company’s employees as required (“mandated”) by the new health care law. The corporation and shareholders claim the government mandating this preventive care coverage be provided violates their rights to freely exercise their religion under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause in the US Constitution. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) is argued to require the US Supreme Court to apply a strict scrutiny analysis.

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court are on March 24, 2014 and the actual decision should be out early this summer. (My money is on the RFRA being struck down as unconstitutional–my money is $1.98 is all though).

Moot Court Competition

Before any of that occurs, the Conestoga case will first face the scrutiny of the 29th annual William E. McGee National Civil Rights Moot Court Competition on February 20, 21 & 22, 2014. This year about 34 teams of law students from across the country will argue the case in this inter-scholastic appellate moot court competition sponsored by the University of Minnesota Law School.

The competition’s mission is to promote interest, reflection and discourse among law students, law faculty and members of the practicing bar and bench in the substance, procedure and practice of civil rights law and to provide opportunity to interested law students to develop the oral advocacy and writing skills essential to be successful appellate practitioners.

We still need attorneys to act as volunteer judges so please contact me if you are interested. It’ll be another great competition this year and I’m proud to play a small part in it.

MKT

Standard
Technically Lawful

FBI: “TECH PROBLEMS” NOT CYBERATTACK DISABLE US COURTS WEBSITES

Despite widespread reports that federal court websites were down nationwide yesterday here in the USA due to a DDOS “cyberattck” (and some outfit taking credit for it on Twitter), the FBI said last night the websites were down due to “technical problems.”

I don’t see many news outlets updating their reports this morning. I suppose “Unknown Hacker-Terrorists Launch Cyberattack on US Justice System” gets more page views than “Federal Websites Back Online After IT Issue Fixed with Server Reboot.” Oh well, they are just journalists after all.

Perhaps a bit less sexy, but a more accurate story is here:

FBI: US court websites went down due to “technical problems,” not DDOS | Ars Technica.

MKT

Standard
Contractually Bound, Litigation of Business | Business of Litigation

Jùdà de chénggōng–巨大的成功

Great Success

I closed the sale of a Chinese restaurant today. It was a typical seller-financed, small business sale. Actually, it even went a little smoother than usual. Just like every single transaction I have ever done, there is always something (usually plural) that complicates things. If you’re lucky, it is no more than a few minor misunderstandings that are easily repaired with a little extra time, patience and understanding.  But for this deal, there was just one. Kinda big one.

Always Something(s)

The buyer and seller only spoke Chinese. My savior (a/k/a my translator) was a Laotian-American woman who had been in Minnesota for a long time. You could hardly tell English was her third language. Problem was, she’d never dealt with legal lingo before and did not have any related business experience. I spent a little extra time when we first met so I could get all the terms and conditions thoroughly explained to me. It all went from Chinese through the lay translator person and then to me. I was more attuned to the increased possibility for misunderstanding so I double/triple checked everything and made sure I understood. Drawing pictures and hand signals seemed to help. Or maybe they were just being kind and polite? Or maybe it’s funny watching a lawyer do hand signals at a conference table? Or maybe all the above?

Meeting of the Minds

At the end of the meeting, I felt confident I understood how the buyer and seller wanted everything structured. Nonetheless, I set it up so there was plenty of time for the buyer and seller to check and question the documents before the closing with the ability to make changes and with hope it would go off as uneventful as possible. I was a little leery when I got the call to set up the closing because I hadn’t edited anything major in the documents. My first drafts are usually pretty good but there is always something that needs tweaking. Or there is something that wasn’t fully explained, understood or written clearly enough. But everything seemed fine and that made me nervous. Nonetheless, the buyer and seller said they were satisfied. They both had it all translated for themselves. They it all reviewed and thought everything was understood.  I was apprehensive, but set up the closing anyway.

ABC–Always Be Clear

As usual, I explained all the big points in each document to make sure everyone understood everything and agreed before anything was signed. The numbers were the easiest. I didn’t have to say much after passing out the amortization schedule, except pointing out where the payments, interest, maturity date, etc. were located on the page. “If there’s no payment made, then . . .”–seemed like a universal phrase. To answer the question if anything could be changed after today, I shook my head and the translator said no.  I explained (with awesome hand gestures) they call it a “closing” (clasped hands together with finality) because once it’s signed, the deal is shut tight and complete (smack open palm on table top). I seemed understood and was proud of my clarity, with the right touch of drama. But then came the hardest part. The most difficult clause.  Whether I have to explain it to a seller or buyer, a high school drop out or summa cum laude graduate, a doctor or dishwasher, a janitor or engineer I never seem to make it clear.  It’s tough enough when the client speaks English, let alone having it translated into Chinese. It was the dreaded  Indemnification provisions.

Unintelligibly Inarticulate

Because I was so nervous and had built up anticipation to a great degree, I struggled and couldn’t pronounce anything clearly: IN-DEMNE-FACI-ATION. IN-DEMN-ICTA. IN-DEM-NE-FI-CA-TION! Yes! (maybe no one will even noticed if I look stone-faced enough) I took a deep breath and slowed down.  I tried to explain it in plain English that could be translated. Once again, I stumbled and mumbled and was incomprehensible. I got frustrated.  Why words all ran togetherintoone. The frustration made me lose patience. As I was reaching for my pen and yellow pad, to draw something brilliant that would clear everything up–it felt like something snapped in my neck. I felt a spark and it all came clear in my head. I am going to always use this in every sale from here on out. I will use this no matter what the folks at the table speak as a first, second, third or fourth language. This I promise myself.

Recompensations for Indemnification

I will never, ever use the words “indemnification” or “compensate” or “reimbursement.” I will never again say “subsequent” or “consequential.” I will never speak of “preceding” or “antecedent.” I will never use these words again when explaining indemnity clauses to anyone as long as I shall live. In their stead, I will only explain indemnification by using these simple, defined key words:

Preceding means before.

So say before.

Subsequent means after.

So say after.

And indemnification?

Easy.

It means protect and take care of.

So say Protect and Take Care Of. Using these terms everything went well. My words were easily translated with just one phrase apiece. So in the end, today’s closing was a Great Success (巨大的成功). I will use my new terminology from now on since today they Shǐ wǒ shòuyì fěi qiǎn (使我受益匪浅). MKT

Standard
Attorneys & Lawyers & Counselors, Fraudulently Fooled

Beware of email attachments purporting to carry case information, courts warn

If I skip my hearing on Tuesday and claim it was because I thought my Notice was a fake court e-mail, will that be a good enough excuse?

“But Your Honor, after Target got hacked and my bank account was drained, I just just couldn’t take any chances.”

MKT
Do I really need to type CLICK BELOW FOR THE REST OF THE STORY?

Beware of email attachments purporting to carry case information, courts warn.

20140118-200938.jpg

Standard